using bdd deploy vista office 2007

Assuming that you have recent hardware platforms (3.2Ghz and 7200RPM drives) and decent networking (100MB), what are your best guesses at how long an installation should take (at the client's PC). I've watched a couple of webcasts on BDD and asked the same question. Their reply was "with a minimal OS, about 30-40 minutes". This seems a little excessive. We are currently deploying WinXP-SP2 with Office 2003 and several smaller apps in under 30 minutes using Ghost DVDs. Our developer image also has VS, Visio, Project, and several other med sized apps and only takes 40-45 mins. I'm concerned that BDD may be faster for me to setup, modify and manage, but it sounds like it will be considerably slower to deploy in the offices. The time it takes to deploy in the offices is crucial. At our current rate, we deploy about 70 PCs per day for 3 months to 4000 clients. I'm concerned that if we used the BDD method, it would drop us down to about 50 per day and extend our deployment time another month. What are your comments on this?

Assuming that you have recent hardware platforms (3.2Ghz and 7200RPM drives) and decent networking (100MB), what are your best guesses at how long an installation should take (at the client's PC). I've watched a couple of webcasts on BDD and asked the same question. Their reply was "with a minimal OS, about 30-40 minutes". This seems a little excessive. We are currently deploying WinXP-SP2 with Office 2003 and several smaller apps in under 30 minutes using Ghost DVDs. Our developer image also has VS, Visio, Project, and several other med sized apps and only takes 40-45 mins. I'm concerned that BDD may be faster for me to setup, modify and manage, but it sounds like it will be considerably slower to deploy in the offices. The time it takes to deploy in the offices is crucial. At our current rate, we deploy about 70 PCs per day for 3 months to 4000 clients. I'm concerned that if we used the BDD method, it would drop us down to about 50 per day and extend our deployment time another month. What are your comments on this?

Well... if it's going to take longer to do using BDD, then just do it the old fashioned way :o)
-- Zack Whittaker » ZackNET Enterprises: www.zacknet.co.uk » MSBlog on ResDev: www.msblog.org » Vista Knowledge Base: www.vistabase.co.uk » This mailing is provided "as is" with no warranties, and confers no rights. All opinions expressed are those of myself unless stated so, and not of my employer, best friend, Ghandi, my mother or my cat. Glad we cleared that up!
--: Original message follows :-- "Kiknbak4now" wrote in message

Assuming that you have recent hardware platforms (3.2Ghz and 7200RPM drives) and decent networking (100MB), what are your best guesses at how long an installation should take (at the client's PC). I've watched a couple of webcasts on BDD and asked the same question. Their reply was "with a minimal OS, about 30-40 minutes". This seems a little excessive. We are currently deploying WinXP-SP2 with Office 2003 and several smaller apps in under 30 minutes using Ghost DVDs. Our developer image also has VS, Visio, Project, and several other med sized apps and only takes 40-45 mins. I'm concerned that BDD may be faster for me to setup, modify and manage, but it sounds like it will be considerably slower to deploy in the offices. The time it takes to deploy in the offices is crucial. At our current rate, we deploy about 70 PCs per day for 3 months to 4000 clients. I'm concerned that if we used the BDD method, it would drop us down to about 50 per day and extend our deployment time another month. What are your comments on this?